Who loves and Hates Hannah Montana?

Who Loves or hates her?

  • Total voters
    16
Status
Not open for further replies.
Starrynite said:
For too long Hannah Montana and me have been bashed in this thread it was time to strike back.

Regardless, the meaning was that Hannah Montana is perhaps one of the greatest artists in the music of today, thus we are commanded to listen to her. No where in that statement did it say that we had to worry about whether or not people are singing her song in public or too much or it being the result of them disliking her. She is popular thus we must listen to her, not because people sing her songs in public, but because she is ultimately skilled. What really is so hard and contradictory about my statements. I see, and most others would agree, nothing is wrong with this statement.
Click to expand...

UGH....you just don't get it do you??? nobody in the world is commanded to do something they don't want, ad i clrearly said that i don't want to listen to hannah montana
 
YOU ARE WRONG JUST STOP!!! EPIC FAIL!!! YOU FAILED IN THE MOST EPIC WAY!!! WE GET YOU LIKE HER AND THAT'S FINE YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO LIKE HER NO ONE IS STOPPING YOU, WE JUST DON'T AGREE, WE DO NOT LIKE HER MUSIC!!!

Sorry for the caps I am getting frustrated here.
 
What, people are commanded to do something if it is being done by something or someone that has awesome and amazing credentials. I do not see how it is so hard to want to listen to Hannah Montana. Its like a TV commercial, people buy Ipods in great demand, thus we are commanded to watch Ipod commercials day and night. Similarly people listen to Hannah Montana in great numbers thus we are commanded to listen to her. What is so difficult about putting two and two together, abandoning your ways and lending her your ear?

And why are people getting heated, Im sorry that you seem to fail to acknowledge a great artist.
 
Okay you like her that's fine, she is a great artist to you that's fine. NOT TO ME. America is supposedly free but the way you are talking about people being "commanded" it doesn't sound like democracy it sounds like totalitarian or fascist. That's fine if the majority like her, I don't. I can do what I feel and listen to what I want. Stop telling me to listen to her because everyone else does, I am my own person with my own identity.
 
Yes, and thats the problem an identity that is aligned with the wrong side of popular opinion. Woe be to they that dont listen. Honestly, she has the credentials that say that she is a great artist, it isnt that I think she is a great artist, it is the fact that she is a great artist cause of fan support, monetary profits and earnings, awards and accolades. You arfe commanded to listen to the president and follow his beckoning because he has the title of president and going against it is breaking the law. This is similar to that.
 
NickThePunk said:
Okay you like her that's fine, she is a great artist to you that's fine. NOT TO ME. America is supposedly free but the way you are talking about people being "commanded" it doesn't sound like democracy it sounds like totalitarian or fascist. That's fine if the majority like her, I don't. I can do what I feel and listen to what I want. Stop telling me to listen to her because everyone else does, I am my own person with my own identity.
Click to expand...

i agree with this, and you starrynite i hope you neve become a president >_>
 
Starrynite said:
Yes, and thats the problem an identity that is aligned with the wrong side of popular opinion. Woe be to they that dont listen. Honestly, she has the credentials that say that she is a great artist, it isnt that I think she is a great artist, it is the fact that she is a great artist cause of fan support, monetary profits and earnings, awards and accolades. You arfe commanded to listen to the president and follow his beckoning because he has the title of president and going against it is breaking the law. This is similar to that.
Click to expand...

No it's not. The President is our leader that we elect. The law is set to create order. With out the government you wouldn't have your precious Hanna Montana. She does not have the credentials of a great artist. She got famous because her dad was a one hit wonder. Luther Vandross is a great artist. The Beatles. People like that not some new pop teen idol. She hasn't been around long enough.

Zidart said:
i agree with this, and you starrynite i hope you neve become a president >_>
Click to expand...

Thanks, and I hope so too haha.
 
HM has been around long enough and been more accomplished than even 10 and 20 year music veterans. To place a time on such a fact as greatness is to deny her the credit she deserves. She has the credentials contrary to your own beliefs and she has become famous because of her own doing. Stop denying her that which she deserves and listen!
 
Starrynite said:
HM has been around long enough and been more accomplished than even 10 and 20 year music veterans. To place a time on such a fact as greatness is to deny her the credit she deserves. She has the credentials contrary to your own beliefs and she has become famous because of her own doing. Stop denying her that which she deserves and listen!
Click to expand...

I already explained to you I have listened to her music. Why don't you stop being so ignorant and listen to what we are saying? I am placing a time on success because it shows that if you are a true great artist you can withstand the tests of time and all the new music coming in to replace your old sound yet you still live.
 
I have listened to what everyone has said with an open arm welcoming every viewpoint. What tests of time could there be when someone has already accomplished much in a short period of time?! I can really think of any.
 
Starrynite said:
Yes, and thats the problem an identity that is aligned with the wrong side of popular opinion. Woe be to they that dont listen. Honestly, she has the credentials that say that she is a great artist, it isnt that I think she is a great artist, it is the fact that she is a great artist cause of fan support, monetary profits and earnings, awards and accolades. You arfe commanded to listen to the president and follow his beckoning because he has the title of president and going against it is breaking the law. This is similar to that.
Click to expand...
Woe to the arrogant lemming who is totally and completely unable to recognize when something is arbitrary.
Starrynite said:
I have listened to what everyone has said with an open arm welcoming every viewpoint.
Click to expand...
This is laughable. You have said that every opinion different than yours was wrong, and lamented that everyone wasn't as enlightened as you, instead of recognizing that this is totally and completely arbitrary.
 
Starrynite said:
What tests of time could there be when someone has already accomplished much in a short period of time?! I can really think of any.
Click to expand...

READ MY WHOLE POST!

NickThePunk said:
I am placing a time on success because it shows that if you are a true great artist you can withstand the tests of time and all the new music coming in to replace your old sound yet you still live.
Click to expand...
 
wow, this topic is huge for discussion over a retarded teen sex icon, cause, that's all she is, eye candy.
 
Gorerotted said:
wow, this topic is huge for discussion over a retarded teen sex icon, cause, that's all she is, eye candy.
Click to expand...

I believe that is not true

she isnt a sex icon

everything is right on the dot
 
Honestly, all of this is uncalled for.

Hannah Montana has had enough time to prove, and she already has, to us that she is a contender in the great realm of musical greatness. There is no doubt that she would be able to always continue to astound us with her loving good sounding tunes and speak to us through her lyrics. How much time are you willing ti give her, a year hasnt been enough for you, two years even, how much 20, 40, 100 years?! I doubt this is a great measure for greatness. In fact is a weird idea to have. If an artist is actually good, then they will be good no matter whether it was their first single or even their 346th song or even their 35th album; thats just it, a good singer is good no matter the time, if she is good today (and she is) then she will no doubt be good for tomorrow and the years to come.
 
Against my better judgement:

Hannah Montana began airing on TV in March 2006.

The Beatles, acknowledged by many as the #1 band of all time, made records together from 1960-1970.

Hmm. What further test of time can there be. </sarcasm> If Miley Cyrus is still making well-received albums in, oh, 2016, then you can say she's proven the test of time.
 
Joyling said:
The Beatles, acknowledged by many as the #1 band of all time, made records together from 1960-1970.
Click to expand...

Not only that but also still be listened to and liked almost 40 years after they stopped making records.
 
What, you doubt that Hannah Montana/Miley Cyrus will be just as popular as she is today as she will be in 10 years? You may think it is impossible, but the facts indicate that she will have a viable lifetime for nearly the same period as the Beatles, if not more!
 
Starrynite said:
Honestly, all of this is uncalled for.

Hannah Montana has had enough time to prove, and she already has, to us that she is a contender in the great realm of musical greatness. There is no doubt that she would be able to always continue to astound us with her loving good sounding tunes and speak to us through her lyrics. How much time are you willing ti give her, a year hasnt been enough for you, two years even, how much 20, 40, 100 years?! I doubt this is a great measure for greatness. In fact is a weird idea to have. If an artist is actually good, then they will be good no matter whether it was their first single or even their 346th song or even their 35th album; thats just it, a good singer is good no matter the time, if she is good today (and she is) then she will no doubt be good for tomorrow and the years to come.
Click to expand...

Alot of bands have been making music much longer than she has

like as joyling said the beatles and the eagles and acdc and all them have made great music and still have great music after all these years

and lets give it to rush which is a great band who came out with another album from what i heard

so im going to add to what joyling said

so i think that if she is still making good music up till 2016 and people are still listening to her music after that
then i will definately say on a worldwide television that she is good

but untill that time she may have a huge fanbase but fans dont prove nothing

if something new and even bigger comes out then those fans will most likely be like "hannah montana is old,

we like so and so now shes much better"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top