B
Boom$ickle
Lurker
Hell yeah it would! Thats why I said that Square should make it.Zidart said:it would be the best final boss ever (on a zelda game)
Hell yeah it would! Thats why I said that Square should make it.Zidart said:it would be the best final boss ever (on a zelda game)
Homicidal Cherry53 said:The last thing Zelda needs is random battles and slow combat. Its an action adventure game.
Not having a ton of enemies doesn't make Zelda have slow combat. When you are in combat it plays like an action game, and to go and try to make that turn-based just doesn't make sense.Strubes said:Unfortunately, slow combat and Zelda go hand in hand. Every once in a while you kill a spider or some zombie. It's more of an adventure game than anything.
You are tapping the same button over and over again to fight..... Just like an RPG! theres a similarity already!Homicidal Cherry53 said:Not having a ton of enemies doesn't make Zelda have slow combat. When you are in combat it plays like an action game, and to go and try to make that turn-based just doesn't make sense.
Yes, and I realize they are turn-based RPG's, but that doesn't mean we should all run out and make the next Zelda turn-based. Its just stupid to change up the gameplay that much, to the point where it can hardly be called a Zelda game anymore.Strubes said:Question. Did you like Paper Mario? Or Mario RPG?
Boom$ickle said:What the heck would your troops be?
and what does that mean!?Hinesmdc said:
Boom$ickle said:and what does that mean!?
Or:fhqwhgads said:play a 3D one and pull out your Bow every step.
Answering this would be like shooting fish in a barrel. >_>Boom$ickle said:How can you think zelda + halo is dumb!?