BV, I'm still confused. :lol
First you say:
I DO WANT EXCLUSIVES FOR SYSTEMS.
and then you say:
What I don't like... Systems are left out.
Isn't the point of making an exclusive game the fact that other systems are left out? It sounds to me like you're literally trying to have your cake and eat it too.
But as someone who can easily get them on the 360, what reason do I have to buy a PS3 if not for PS3 exclusives?
I think I see what you're saying now. I forgot you already owned a 360, and I was speaking as someone who was hypothetically system-less and looking at the various game lineups of the Wii, PS3, and 360, comparing and contrasting what they had to offer. Assuming this scenario I could not figure out why you would simply overlook games that were on the PS3 simply because they were also on the 360.
Given your situation
as it is (and not how I previously imagined it to be) I would still input that a lot of the multiplatform games either appear on the 360 and/or PC as well, in which case the benefits of the PS3 versions would be the ability to have 8 players in the same room as yourself (especially useful for sports games), and also the fact that online would be free. Also, one would stand to reason that the graphics would be better, at least in some cases. So I still think that multiplatform games would be incentives to buy the PS3 instead of other consoles. Features such as those would be reasons to buy a PS3 in addition to exclusive games.
As for the last part, I don't believe that I ever said that.
No, you didn't. But you did imply that a system's laungh lineup strength was in it's exclusive titles, and I propositioned that it's strength was in it's variety of gameplay, regardless of exclusivity. So I was more or less disagreeing with the criteria you chose to judge the PS3 launch lineup on.
IF every system had the same game... What's the point of many different consoles?
Ya, how
horrible it would be if we only had to buy one console to play all the games we loved. :

:lol